Full publication list is available: Research Gate  / Google Scholar

Springett, J. and Masuda, J.R. Participatory research and evaluation. Invited chapter to be published in Rootman, I. and O’Neill M. (eds). Health Promotion in Canada: Critical Perspectives on Practice, 4th Edition. Toronto, Canadian Scholars’ Press.

Masuda, J., Skinner, E. (2016)

Countermapping Inner City “Deprivation” in Winnipeg, Canada

Masuda, J., Bookman, S. (2016).

Neighbourhood branding and the right to the city

Skinner, E., Masuda, J. (2016).

Mapping the Geography of Health Inequity through Participatory Hip Hop

Alaazi, D. A., Masuda, J. Evans, J., Distasio, J. (2015).

Therapeutic landscapes of home: Exploring Indigenous peoples’ experiences of a Housing First intervention in Winnipeg

Masuda, J. (2014).

Environmental Justice and Health

Masuda, J., Teelucksingh, C. (2012).

Urban environmental justice through the camera: understanding the politics of space and the right to the city


Using the lens of Lefebvre’s spatial trialectics, we assess the utility of photo-elicited interviewing for environmental justice, recognising that a view to social spatial analysis is essential to engaging with the historical processes of exclusion and discrimination that are crucial to explaining why unequal distributions of environmental injustice are systemic and not random. Drawing on insights from our own photo-elicited interviewing-based work in the neighbourhood called Parkdale in Toronto, we make two main recommendations for future environmental justice work using photo-elicited interviewing. First, researchers must be open to a broader epistemology, one that draws on a more spatially nuanced and temporally evolving knowledge of the full range of environmental influences on communities. Second, in order to arrive at a more robust critical analysis of social space, researchers should complement photo-elicited interviewing with historical research about the relevant communities and include participants from other comparative communities.

Masuda, J., Poland, B., & Baxter, J. (2010).

Reaching for environmental health justice: Canadian experiences for a comprehensive research, policy and advocacy agenda in health promotion.


Spatial disparities in environmental quality and practices are contributing to rising health inequalities worldwide. To date, the field of health promotion has not contributed as significantly as it might to a systematic analysis of the physical environment as a determinant of health nor to a critique of inequitable environmental governance practices responsible for social injustice-particularly in the Canadian context. In this paper, we explore ways in which health promotion and environmental justice perspectives can be combined into an integrated movement for environmental health justice in health promotion. Drawing on Canadian experiences, we describe the historical contributions and limitations of each perspective in research, policy and particularly professional practice. We then demonstrate how recent environmental justice research in Canada is moving toward a deeper and multi-level analysis of environmental health inequalities, a development that we believe can inform a comprehensive research, policy and advocacy agenda in health promotion toward environmental health justice as a fundamental determinant of health. Lastly, we propose four key considerations for health promotion professionals to consider in advancing this movement.

Masuda, J. R., & Crabtree, A. (2010).

Environmental justice in the therapeutic inner city. Health and Place, 16(4), 656-665.


Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside (DTES) has long been characterized as Canada’s skid row within public narratives that raise concerns about communicable diseases, open drug use, survival sex work, and homelessness. This stigmatizing gaze has bolstered a deficit-oriented philosophy that emphasizes measures to mitigate these threats, ostensibly by erasing the moral and environmental depravity from the landscape. However, such measures threaten to further marginalize DTES residents by perpetuating public sentiments of fear and disgust toward the inner city. In this paper, we challenge this orientation by reporting the results of a research process in which DTES residents chronicled their impressions of the neighbourhood. Our findings reveal a paradoxical therapeutic response to environmental injustice in the inner city, one that enables society’s most marginalized people to find support, solidarity, and acceptance in their everyday struggles to survive, even thrive, amidst the structural and physical violence of the urban margins.

Masuda, J. R. (., Zupancic, T., Poland, B., & Cole, D. C. ). (2008).

Environmental health and vulnerable populations in canada: Mapping an integrated equity-focused research agenda. Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 52(4), 427-450.


The uneven distribution of environmental hazards across space and in vulnerable populations reflects underlying societal inequities. Fragmented research has led to gaps in comprehensive understanding of and action on environmental health inequities in Canada and there is a need to gain a better picture of the research landscape in order to integrate future research. This paper provides an initial assessment of the state of the environmental health research field as specifically focused on vulnerable populations in Canada. We present a meta-narrative literature review to identify under-integrated areas of knowledge across disciplinary fields. Through systematic searching and categorization, we assess the abstracts of a total of 308 studies focused on the past 30 years of Canadian environmental health inequity research in order to describe temporal, geographical, contextual and epistemological patterns. The results reveal that there has been significant growth in Canadian research documenting the uneven distributions and impacts of environmental hazards across locations and populations since the 1990s, but its focus has been uneven. Notably, there is a lack of research aimed at integrating evidence-based and policy-relevant evaluation of environmental health inequities and how they are created and sustained. Areas for future research are recommended including more interdisciplinary, multimethod and preventive approaches to resolve the environmental burden placed on vulnerable populations and to promote environmental health equity.


Outcomes and Proceedings from:

Environment, Health, and Social Equity Toward a Canadian Agenda for Knowledge Production, Translation, and Capacity Building, May 24 – 25th 2007

Related Links:

Research Gate  / Google Scholar